Cultural Relevance Map: US Alcohol Brands (2004–2025)
A clickable 2×2 to track how brands sit in culture over time. Author: Alvin J Lin · Licence: MIT
2004
How to read: X = Offline / In Real Life (IRL) → Online / Networked. Y = Individual Expression → Collective Purpose. Score ≈ 75% search attention + 25% motto adjacency.
How is the score calculated
- Signals (per brand, per year):
- Cultural attention — normalised Google Search interest for the brand in the United States (0–100).
- Motto adjacency — cosine similarity between the brand’s motto/positioning text & a reference set of cultural themes (e.g., community, craft, creativity, sustainability) using sentence embeddings; re-scaled to 0–100.
- Blend:
Score = 0.75 × attention + 0.25 × adjacency
(bounded to 0–100). - Normalisation: within each year we min–max scale across all tracked brands & clip extreme outliers (≈1st–99th pct).
- Handling gaps: if a year is missing, we use the nearest available year; the animation linearly interpolates between years for smooth motion.
- Category roll-ups: simple average of member brands in that category for the selected year.
- Interpretation: higher scores = more cultural salience/fit (not a sales metric & not dependent on media spend).
Chronology of cultural inflection points (1989–2025)
2×2 Cultural Relevance Map
Hover to see details; toggle “Show scores” for on-chart numbers.
Tip: Up/right = more networked communities & shared causes; down/left = IRL rituals & personal identity cues.
Top-N Cultural Relevance (Brands)
Click a row to focus the selection. Scores are 0–100.
Rank | Name | Type | Manufacturer | Score |
---|
Brand Momentum Over Time
Details