Cultural Relevance Map — UK-style Spelling • Author: Alvin J Lin

Cultural Relevance Map: US Alcohol Brands (2004–2025)

A clickable 2×2 to track how brands sit in culture over time. Author: Alvin J Lin · Licence: MIT

2004

How to read: X = Offline / In Real Life (IRL) → Online / Networked. Y = Individual Expression → Collective Purpose. Score75% search attention + 25% motto adjacency.

How is the score calculated

  1. Signals (per brand, per year):
    • Cultural attention — normalised Google Search interest for the brand in the United States (0–100).
    • Motto adjacency — cosine similarity between the brand’s motto/positioning text & a reference set of cultural themes (e.g., community, craft, creativity, sustainability) using sentence embeddings; re-scaled to 0–100.
  2. Blend: Score = 0.75 × attention + 0.25 × adjacency (bounded to 0–100).
  3. Normalisation: within each year we min–max scale across all tracked brands & clip extreme outliers (≈1st–99th pct).
  4. Handling gaps: if a year is missing, we use the nearest available year; the animation linearly interpolates between years for smooth motion.
  5. Category roll-ups: simple average of member brands in that category for the selected year.
  6. Interpretation: higher scores = more cultural salience/fit (not a sales metric & not dependent on media spend).

Chronology of cultural inflection points (1989–2025)

2×2 Cultural Relevance Map

Hover to see details; toggle “Show scores” for on-chart numbers.

Offline / In Real Life (IRL) Online / Networked Individual Expression Collective Purpose IRL × Individual Online × Individual IRL × Collective Online × Collective

Tip: Up/right = more networked communities & shared causes; down/left = IRL rituals & personal identity cues.

Top-N Cultural Relevance (Brands)

Click a row to focus the selection. Scores are 0–100.

RankNameTypeManufacturerScore

Brand Momentum Over Time